PsychonauticswithMike Jay
May 17, 2024
Here he focuses on the long history, within western science, of researchers exploring the effects and effectiveness of different drugs through self-experimentation.
The question of plant consciousness made waves in the 1960s and ’70s with the publication of research by lie detector expert Cleve Backster (1968) and the popularization of his work in “The Secret Life of Plants” by Tompkins and Bird (1973). By measuring electrical resistance in the leaves of plants, Backster demonstrated that plants were sensitive to events in the environment, including threats to the plant, death of nearby organisms, and human interaction, particularly human emotions. The current research sought to replicate some of Backster’s findings, focusing on spontaneous emotion during human interaction. Plant electrical activity was measured with a GSR device during conversations involving the experimenter and acquaintances, using a plant that the experimenter had cared for (Schefflera Arboricola, Trinette variety), for a duration of more than two years.
Comparisons were made of activity during 4-second intervals of time with the presence of emotions (e.g., anger, surprise, embarrassment) versus 4-second intervals of no activity in the room containing the plant, revealing a highly significant difference. A comparison of the emotional intervals against all other human interaction intervals was also highly significant. Controls employed indicate that these differences are not due to temperature, sound, or movement. Movement artifacts are particularly important to control for, as nearby movement produces electrical changes in the leaves, even without contact. Interaction intervals with possible movement artifacts were excluded from the calculations.
The importance of genuine emotion in evoking these responses points to the necessity of ecologically valid and spontaneous situations for a proper scientific study of plant perceptual responses. Further work needs to be done to replicate findings about long-distance effects, as well as other “Backster effects” involving single celled organisms and human cells. Additionally, the nature of the signal and the reason for electrical manifestation of these responses are in need of further investigation.
Contact information: Ben Bendig, M.A., C.Phil, UCLA Department of Psychology, bbendig@ucla.edu
Recorded at the 31st annual SSE Conference in 2012 at the Millennium Hotel in Boulder, Colorado, USA.
Special thanks to our Patreon Explorers for providing the support we need to keep our video content freely available online: Dr. CMC Toporow, Kathleen Erickson, Mark Crewson, Mark Urban-Lurain, Roger Nelson, and Sandy Wiener.
Want to support our commitment to open access scientific research? Become a patron yourself: https://www.patreon.com/user?u=23234339
Or take your support of our 501(c)(3) nonprofit even further by becoming an SSE member: https://www.scientificexploration.org…
The SSE provides a forum for original research into cutting edge and unconventional areas. Views and opinions belong only to the speakers, and are not necessarily endorsed by the SSE.
Published on November 14, 2018